By the Right of Property thus shall kill poor people if thus shall join the OECD.
The right for property entitles a human being to the profits of his intangible or physical possessions. In the United States today enterprises are entitled to all the human rights and to the profits they worth to them. Democracy walks on the thin line between keeping the Natural Human Rights to taking care of the public. This raises the question of balancing the enterprise’s will to profits and the public right to use those ideas. When it comes to medicines, the public need is always there and the fight about the right time to let generic medicine companies to sell their drugs in lower prices, which can benefit the lower economical groups. In Israel the state law declares that intangible possession of producing medicine drugs are up to 4.5 years, in the U.S it’s for 10 years. This enables generic manufactured cheaper medicines to enter the Israeli Social bag of medicines.
It’s well known that the U.S is the most capitalist country in the world. In the name of defending the natural human right of property, the U.S government’s rules destroy the right for opinion (citation in parody is prohibited) and the right for employment (if you are the owner of the idea u cannot benefit from it) and the right to live in health and security (for 10 years). Israeli law defends those rights under the idea that they are much more important than the right of the rich to stay rich/become richer. This is the base to many lawsuits between American innovative medicine enterprises and Israeli generic medicine enterprises such as TEVA in the Israeli Supreme Court.
The American administration stayed away from these legal encounters until lately. A few days ago landed on the desk of the Israeli minister of industrial and commercial affairs a document of over 40 pages that was prepared by the American government to establish the entrance to the OECD. Between these pages was a question of the legal work that the Israeli law is doing to meet the American standards of legal rights of innovative medicine enterprises to their intangible formulas. The document specifically says that this legal issue can affect the chances of Israel to join the OECD. From this I conclude that American medicinal enterprises pressured their Government to pressure the Israeli government to change the current legal state in Israel.
Now, don’t get me wrong, if American governors want the rich to stay rich in the expense of poor people being killed, just because they couldn’t afford medicines, it’s the problem of the American people. And if the American people have no problem with that, why should I have one? My problem is that the Americans try to enforce the Israeli government to sentence thousands of Israeli poor citizens to death just so American rich could stay rich.
Why should Israelis die in order to make rich people richer?
TevaPharms ; OECD on wiki ; OECD portal